Feed on
Posts
Comments

Storytellers, by the very act of telling, communicate a radical learning that changes lives and the world: telling stories is a universally accessible means through which people make meaning.” — Chris Cavanaugh

StoytellerThis weekend, storytellers from around the world gathered at Colonial Williamsburg to participate in the Third Annual Storytelling Festival. Art Johnson, a historical interpreter, talked with Lloyd Dobyns, host of Colonial Williamsburg podcast series. Art brings up a very interesting point when he states, “Listening to a good storyteller, or listening to somebody you are interested in hearing what they’re telling you about, you get wrapped up in their voice. Their voice will lead you to a place that you forget about where you are and what you’re doing; you’re in their world. That’s the difference between a good storyteller and somebody just talking to you in front of an audience.

Where is the connection to IT? No, nothing to do with making up meaningless metrics to impress the CEO. Storytelling can be about real facts and events, just told in an engaging manner. The real connection is that both storytelling and IT deal with handling and interpreting information. This can be done both through the written word or through speech. In other words, through blogs or through podcasts.

Dr. Rohit Khare, director of CommerceNet Labs, had a discussion with Jon Udell on “Syndication-Oriented Architecture (SynOA).” Dr. Rohit points out that rapid innovation of “Web 2.0″ syndication and social collaboration tools are spurring enterprise leaders to implement syndication as a core component of their Service-Oriented Architectures. The increased volume of unstructured data is overwhelming employees, customers, and customers. Businesses are challenged with finding a way to connect relevant and actionable information with the people that drive business. Dr. Khare states:

You do in some ways centralize the information flow, but you get the benefit of decentralized awareness — it’s an interesting paradox. If I have one syndication bus that’s responsible for delivering information to all of my users, and everyone in the community, then that same piece of software is in a very good position to detect patterns and emerging trends. If you think about meme trackers that can report, hey, this is a hot story that’s come up in the last few hours, that’s going to be really powerful when it mainstreams.

Dr. Khare goes on to say, “Syndication standards are no longer just formats for relaying headline news. Now they can enable ‘information agility’ for all of the knowledge flowing inside and outside the enterprise.” This basically is the idea of “RSSifying” everything, then putting all the feeds through a “syndication bus.”

Dr. Khare points to Facebook as an example of a syndication-oriented application. Facebook users are constantly interpreting and publishing events onto a syndication bus while at the same time subscribing to aggregated feeds published by their friends who interpret and publish events. On and on it goes. What data gets delivered to the individual and how it gets presented depends on what their friends decided to publish and how their friends interpret the event. In other words, people are the storytellers.

Now consider Art Johnson words:

Storytellers tell their stories their way. Those who are more creative, who can create stories, they definitely tell it their way. The way they tell it, and if you listen to them, they could tell you the same story three different times, in three different ways. If you were to put them all together, you’ll hear there are a whole lot more likenesses than there are differences.

Personalization is exactly what both storytellers and the subscribers of Facebook are doing. SynOA is meant to guide a wide range of services. Under SynOA, information overload is broken up into five layers of increasingly sophisticated capabilities: Publication, Subscription, Distribution, Personalization, and Collaboration.

Tom Kelleher and Barbara M. Miller did study for the School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, titled “Organizational Blogs and the Human Voice: Relational Strategies and Relational Outcomes.” They evaluated the potential advantages of organizational blogs over traditional Web sites. What they found is that blogs are a good place to speak candidly with a conversational style. This conversational style, “may be an important part of the process of building and maintaining computer-mediated relationships. Among the most important findings of this study are that:

  1. blogs were perceived as more conversational than organizational Web sites
  2. this conversational human voice correlated positively with other previously-identified relationship outcomes.

The perceived personal nature of organizational blogs, in this case, is related to relationship indicators.” They go on to state, “To enter the market conversation, Web sites need to have a voice, express a point of view, ignite a dialogue, and give access to helpful people (Searls & Weinberger, 2001). It all starts with having a voice. Expressing a point of view in a personal tone in a blog is likely a good way to get a conversation started.

Christopher Locke, Rick Levine, Doc Searls, and David Weinberger write in their book, “The Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual“, “the best of the people in PR are not PR Types at all. They’re the company’s best conversationalists.” The point being, one has to engaged the reader or listener. That is a key attribute of an effective storytellers.

I have heard from some busy people how they prefer RSS feeds over podcasts, because podcasts can get a bit off topic and chatty. With RSS feeds you can scan for information. There lies a potential problem. Nielsen Norman Group researchers did a study involving newsletters. They found that the average time allocated to an email newsletter after opening it is just 51 seconds. People scan the text, with only 19% of newsletters being read fully. Eyetracking observations of users reading RSS news feeds showed that people scan the headlines and blurbs in feeds even more ruthlessly than they scan newsletters.

Having people scan posting and read only 19% or less of what is written does not seem an effective way to engage the reader or listener. Michael Stelzner, in his posting, “Using Voice to Engage Readers, A Case Study” makes some interesting points. When he was a sales manager at The Sharper Image, they found that if they walked around the store with an expensive product in their hands and showed folks how it worked, the sales of that product grew dramatically. Michael experimented by recording a voice snippet that auto played after a few seconds, when someone visits the website for his book, “Writing White Papers.” The recording just told visitors how they could hear a sample chapter of the book by clicking on a link. While the link had been there all along, Michael reports that, “Indeed people did follow my voice instructions significantly more AFTER I asked them to click on a special link.”

The moral of the story is that one has to engage the reader. Some folks are just going to want the facts. Their limited time might make them less inclined to care about the personalization and collaboration stage of SynOA. These folks are like that manager I wrote of earlier, who was so busy he did other work while in meetings. I would caution that there is a real danger in not taking the time to listen to others and learn how to communicate effectively. I worked with a guy once who was a very hard working and intelligent individual. Because he was so hard working, he was promoted to the point where he had several people working for him. The problems was, he valued his own abilities so much, he never saw the value in others. He never developed effective communication or collaboration skills. There comes a point where no matter how brilliant and hard working you might be, there simply are not enough hours in the day. People have to rely on each others to get complicated jobs done. We can learn from each other. On a good team, each member brings their own perspective. It the classic story of the blind men and the elephant. It is through the collaboration phase that we gain knowledge of the larger picture. If you cannot communicate your knowledge, good team work is impossible and your effectiveness is severely limited. This is why IT needs good storytellers.

Leave a Reply

Bad Behavior has blocked 614 access attempts in the last 7 days.