Security Advancements at the Monastery » Education http://blog.securitymonks.com Information about developments at the Monastery Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:49:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 en hourly 1 OMB Says Bring on the Clouds: Frightening or Funny? http://blog.securitymonks.com/2010/01/18/omb-says-bring-on-the-clouds-frightening-or-funny/ http://blog.securitymonks.com/2010/01/18/omb-says-bring-on-the-clouds-frightening-or-funny/#comments Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:13:04 +0000 John Gerber http://blog.securitymonks.com/?p=1743 Jason Miller, Executive Editor for FederalNewsRadio, write in his article, “Agencies to justify not using cloud computing to OMB” that OMB “will require agencies to develop an alternative analysis discussing how they could use cloud computing for all major technology projects for the fiscal 2012 budget.” This is according to an internal budget documents obtained by FederalNewsRadio. The document details OMB’s plans for such high-profile initiatives such as data center consolidation and the use of cloud computing and cybersecurity spending.

Miller goes on to report that OMB will require “agencies launch a series of cloud computing pilots across the government in 2010 using the E-Government Fund.” In 2013, Miller reports, agencies must provide OMB “a complete alternatives analysis for mixed life cycle projects where agencies are spending new money-known as development, modernization and enhancement-and steady state or operations and maintenance funding for how they could move to cloud computing.”

Miller quotes a former government official as saying, “They are not saying use it, but are pushing us to look at it and do an analysis of alternatives and make a decision based on our business needs. They are pushing us to look at it, yet giving us the ability to decide whether it makes sense.”

How well does your organization understand cloud computing? How will security be handled? What can you do to prepare? During this time of tight budgets, maybe you do not have the funds and/or time to attend conferences and training events. Fortunately, presentations are being posted regularly to the web, allowing you to keep informed on technological challenges. For example, the ZISC Workshop on Security in Virtualized Environments and Cloud Computing, held September 10-11th in Zurich, recently posted all their presentations:

Welcome note Bernhard Plattner and Diego Zamboni
Talk 1: Not Every Cloud has a Silver Lining Gunter Ollmann, Damballa Inc., Atlanta GA, USA
Talk 2: Virtualization and Cloud Computing: Security’s Golden or Gilded Age Kevin Skapinetz, IBM Internet Security Systems, Atlanta GA, USA
Talk 3: Using virtualization technology for fault and intrusion tolerance Hans P. Reiser, University of Lisbon, Portugal
Talk 4: A survey of current security-related operating systems research Timothy Roscoe, ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Talk 5: Of Cold Steam, Mist and Vapour: A View from the Inside of the Cloud Dirk Kuhlmann, HP Labs Bristol, UK
Talk 6: New Cloud Computing challenges: the security impact in the “social” world. Massimo Villari, University of Messina, Italy
Talk 7: Paradigms in virtualization based host security Tal Garfinkel, VMware Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA / Stanford University, Palo Alto CA, USA
Talk 8: Cloud Computing and Security: a Googley Perspective Peter Dickman, Google Inc., Zurich, Switzerland
Talk 9: A NIST Perspective on Cloud Computing Tim Grance, National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA
Talk 10: ENISA Risk Assessment of Cloud Computing – Preliminary Results Giles Hogben, ENISA, EU
Talk 11: Attack Graphs + Mechanically Generated Constraints Lee Badger, National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA
Wrap-up and end Bernhard Plattner and Diego Zamboni

Following NIST’s involvement in an area like cloud computing can help you judge the direction the government is heading. Tim Grance presented at the 5th Annual IT Security Automation Conference and Expo Presentations and the presentations have been made available. Grance presented on the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) (see my previous post “Standardization and Interoperability in Security” for additional information on SCAP). A cloud computing track consisting only of slides (no video) was also posted. If lack of video does not concern you, the following conferences have posted slides on cloud security:

If you prefer to listen and do not need to see slides, Tim Grance can be heard on Dana Gardner’s BriefingsDirect podcast, “Panel Discussion: Is Cloud Computing More or Less Secure than On-Premises IT?.” The discussion includes a panel of all stars from the cloud security community, including Glenn Brunette, distinguished engineer and chief security architect at Sun Microsystems and founding member of the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA); Doug Howard, chief strategy officer of Perimeter eSecurity and president of USA.NET; Christofer Hoff, technical adviser at CSA and director of Cloud and Virtualization Solutions at Cisco Systems; and Dr. Richard Reiner, CEO of Enomaly. The podcast was recorded at the Open Group’s 23rd Enterprise Architecture Practitioners Conference in Toronto on July 20-22, 1009, along with:

For more video presentations on the cloud security, awhile back I posted “CERT, CERIAS, the Academy, and Google Video: Training Online.” Two other sources include the SecurityTube and O’Reilly Webcasts. Below are a few examples of the presentations available:

  • The Belgian Beer Lovers Guide to Cloud Security (Brucon 2009) Tutorial by Craig Balding at Brucon 2009: In this presentation Craig covers why talking about “cloud” is akin to walking into a Belgian bar and asking for “beer”; the common cloud architectures and their implications for you – the security dude; what the beer brewing Trappist Monks can teach us about cloud security; attacking clouds (aka getting free beer); and dealing with the hangover: cloud incident response & forensics.
  • Evolution of Security (Fsecure) Tutorial by F-Secure: an animated series on the various threats out there on the Internet and also talks about their state of the art AV (self promotion) ;-) They also talk about “cloud security” and how the next generation AV will be in the cloud and not isolated.
  • Cloud Security and Privacy by Tim Mather, Subra Kumaraswamy, Shahed Latif: discusses cloud computing’s SPI delivery model, and its impact on various aspects of enterprise information security (e.g., infrastructure, data, identity and access management, security management), privacy, and compliance. Security-as-a-Service and the impact of cloud computing on corporate IT is also discussed.
  • Architecting Applications for the Cloud by Jorge Noa: This presentation analyzes aspects of the Amazon EC2 IaaS cloud environment that differ from a traditional data center and introduces general best practices for ensuring data privacy, storage persistence, and reliable DBMS backup.
  • Cloud Computing: The Next Frontier for Open Source by Bernard Golden: discusses how the trends of open source and cloud computing reinforce one another, and why cloud computing is a significant driver of enterprise open source adoption.
  • Getting Started with Amazon Web Services by Cloud Security Deep Dive by Subra Kumaraswamy, Shahed Latif, Tim Mather: will take a deep dive into cloud security issues and focus on three specific aspects: (1) data security; (2) identity management in the cloud, and; (3) governance in the cloud (in the context of managing a cloud service provider with respect to security obligations). Each of these three topics will be covered in a 30 minute segment that will include a presentation and Q&A with the audience.
  • Cloudburst (Hacking 3D and Breaking Out of VMware) Blackhat 2009 by Kostya Kortchinsky: VMware products include implement a lot of functionality, and as such have a decent chance to include some bugs. CLOUDBURST is the combination of 3 of those found in the virtualized video device (more specifically the 3D code). Combined, these allow a user in a Guest to execute code on the Host. Since the virtualized device code is the same for all the branches of the products, this impacts Workstation, as well as Fusion or ESX. Immunity, Inc. will present the various vulnerabilities and the techniques used to exploit the bug reliably, even on platforms with ASLR or DEP such as Vista SP1. Once exploited, Immunity will demonstrate how to establish MOSDEF between the Host and Guest.
  • Virtualization: Resource Coupling and Security across the Stack by Dennis Moreau, Configuresoft: The session briefly addressed extension to the cloud and utility computing infrastructures to address how to use configuration and behavioral information to address the increased complexity of security, compliance and risk assessment in virtualized environments.

Other BruCON Security Conference (held September 18-19, 2009) videos are available at their vimeo channel. O’Reilly maintains on YouTube an O’Reilly Media Channel along with an area to sign up for future webcasts. Blackhat DC 2009 video, audio, whitepapers, and slides are also available. Content is ever changing, so keep checking the sites.

Remember that Vivek Kundra, Chief Information Officer (CIO) of the United States of America, outlined as his team’s priorities:

  1. Innovation
  2. Lowering the cost of Government
  3. Transparency
  4. Engaging Citizens
  5. Ensuring a safe computing environment

In response, FedScoop! started hosting one event each quarter around these pillars. On October 14 at the Newseum, they did their first event bringing together executives in the White House and federal CIO’s, CTO’s, and decision-makers to talk about lowering the cost of government with technology. Check out the video of the Cyber Security Panel. Since one of the topics was cloud computing, FedScoop! scheduled a follow-up event. On December 9th, 2009, they hosted and posted the “Cloud Computing Shoot Out.”

FederalNewsRadio has posted a three part video series on secure cloud computing. The panelists include Jim Flyzik, President of the Flyzik Group; Henry Sienkiewicz, Technical Program Director, Computer Services, Defense Information Systems Agency; Ronald Bechtold, Army Architecture Integration Center at Headquarters, Department of the Army, Chief Information Office/G6; Curt Aubley, Chief Technology Officer CTO Operations & Next Generation Solutions, Lockheed Martin Information Systems & Global Services; Dale Wickizer, Chief Technology Officer-Public Sector, NetApp, Inc.; and Aileen Black, Vice President of Public Sector VMware Inc.

CNET’s editor of Webware, Rafe Needleman and senir writer Stephen Shankland talked with Christofer Hoff on the Reporters’ Roundtable podcast about the “Dangers of Cloud Computing.” Chris also presented at Microsoft’s BlueHat, “Cloudifornication: Indiscriminate Information Intercourse Involving Internet Infrastructure.” Any presentation with such a great title must be watched. There is a short interview with Chris from Bluehat.

One of my favorite stories of Abraham Lincoln involved the McCormick-Manny case of 1855 where Lincoln was one of Manny’s lawyers. Lincoln basically was pushed aside and humiliated. After the trial, he told Ralph Emerson, a young lawyer who was present at the trial, “I am going home. I am going home to study law.” Emerson asked, “Mr. Lincoln, you stand at the head of the bar in Illinois now! What are you talking about?” Lincoln replied, “Ah, yes, I do occupy a good position there, and I think that I can get along with the way things are done there now. But these college-trained men, who have devoted their whole lives to study, are coming West, don’t you see? And they study their cases as we never do. They have got as far as Cincinnati now. They will soon be in Illinois.” Emerson stated Lincoln turned to him, his countenance suddenly assuming that look of strong determination which those who knew him best sometimes saw upon his face, and said, “I am going home to study law! I am as good as any of them, and when they get out to Illinois, I will be ready for them.”

Change is coming. If you try just to get along, the future will overwhelm you. While we do not live in a world of unlimited funds for conferences and training, people are sharing a wealth of information. Take advantage of it and get ready for whatever might be heading your way.

]]>
http://blog.securitymonks.com/2010/01/18/omb-says-bring-on-the-clouds-frightening-or-funny/feed/ 1
Movement on the US Cyber Command http://blog.securitymonks.com/2010/01/05/movement-on-the-us-cyber-command/ http://blog.securitymonks.com/2010/01/05/movement-on-the-us-cyber-command/#comments Tue, 05 Jan 2010 06:46:09 +0000 John Gerber http://blog.securitymonks.com/?p=1682 The US Cyber Command has been an interesting story to watch. Similar to the old Charlie Brown comic strips where he continuously tried kicking the football only to have Lucy pull it away at the last minute. Now Ellen Nakashima, from the Washington Post, is reporting that “Pentagon computer-network defense command delayed by congressional concerns.” Still, movement is occurring. The Pentagon hopes to brief lawmakers this month to clear the way for confirmation hearing of the Cyber Command’s new director.

For a little perspective, remember back in August 2008, the Air Force suspended all efforts to the establishment of the Cyber Command. This was after the Air Force was hyping the Cyber Command capabilities on TV, in Web video advertisement, and in presentations. In September, the Pentagon decided that the US Strategic Command in Omaha, NE should create and run a version of the joint Cyber Command. Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England wrote in a memo, “Because all the combatant commands, military departments and other defense components need the ability to work unhindered in cyberspace, the domain does not fall within the purview of any particular department or component.”

In October, top Air Force leadership decided to continue efforts to stand up the Cyber Command. At the time, Air Force Secretary Michael Donley made the statement, “The conduct of cyber operations is a complex issue, as [Defense] and other interagency partners have substantial equity in the cyber arena. We will continue to do our part to increase Air Force cyber capabilities and institutionalize our cyber mission.”

Top military officials in May 2009 argued for a single joint command and went on to tell the media that a “Cyber attack could bring U.S. military response.” In June 2009, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates in a memo Stated, “Our increasing dependency on cyberspace, alongside a growing array of cyber threats and vulnerabilities, adds a new element of risk to our national security. To address this risk effectively and to secure freedom of action in cyberspace, the Department of Defense requires a command that possesses the required technical capability and remains focused on the integration of cyberspace operations.”

The Defense Department failed to meet an Oct. 1 target launch date. There have been no confirmation hearing for the command’s first director. Nakashima is reporting that the project was delayed by “congressional questions about its mission and possible privacy concerns.”

NSA Deputy Director John (Chris) Inglis said “90 percent” of the command’s focus will be on defensive measures because “that’s where we are way behind.” The offensive measure lead to many policy and doctrinal questions involving cyber warfare. Nakashima goes on to report one official familiar with the Pentagon’s plans, who was not authorized to speak for the record, stated “The rules can vary dramatically depending upon under what authority you’re doing something. An offensive action is not a decision that can be taken very lightly. It is an extraordinary action because of the consequences that could result for either DOD or the intelligence community or critical U.S. industries.”

Offensive computing is a difficult topic to tackle. Remember Col. Charles W. Williamson III? He ran into a bit of controversy back in May 2008 when he posted “Carpet bombing in cyberspace: Why America needs a military botnet.” He stated, “America needs a network that can project power by building an af.mil robot network (botnet) that can direct such massive amounts of traffic to target computers that they can no longer communicate and become no more useful to our adversaries than hunks of metal and plastic.” Richard Bejtlich’s post, “Mutually Assured DDoS” points out several of the problems with a af.mil robot network. Sean Sullivan from F-Secure also did a thoughtful response titled “US Air Force Colonel Proposes Skynet.” The problem will always be in cyberspace, attackers do not wear uniforms, nor do they necessarily come from a particular domain. It is not so easy to identifying the enemy. The intelligent attacker makes all effort to blend into the population.

Paul B. Kurtz, a cybersecurity expert who served in the George W. Bush and Clinton administrations stated, “I don’t think there’s any dispute about the need for Cyber Command. We need to do better defending DOD networks and more clearly think through what we’re going to do offensively in cyberspace. But the question is how does that all mesh with existing organizations and authorities? The devil really is in the details.”

Nakashima reports officials stated:

“The initial operating plan for a cyber command is straightforward: to merge the Pentagon’s defensive unit, Joint Task Force-Global Network Operations, with its offensive outfit, the Joint Functional Command Component-Network Warfare, at Fort Meade, home to the NSA. The new command, which would include about 500 staffers, would leverage the NSA’s technical capabilities but fall under the Pentagon’s Strategic Command.

Lt. Gen. Keith B. Alexander, director of the NSA, has been nominated by President Obama to be the director of the Cyber Command. Congressional staff have been briefed three times, and the Pentagon hopes to brief lawmakers this month. Once the staff are satisfied the understand the command’s purpose and operating place, the Senate Armed Service Committee can hold the confirmation hearing for a new director.

Edmund Burke once said, “All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing.” Of course, Saint Bernard of Clairvaux would have cautioned, “Hell is full of good intentions or desires.” While there are many issues involved with the development of a US Cyber Command, steps are continuing to occur. Issues are being considered. Is it progress? I believe so. Stay tuned and we will all see what happens.

]]>
http://blog.securitymonks.com/2010/01/05/movement-on-the-us-cyber-command/feed/ 2
Santa’s Secrets Leaked http://blog.securitymonks.com/2009/12/21/santas-secrets-leaked/ http://blog.securitymonks.com/2009/12/21/santas-secrets-leaked/#comments Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:00:11 +0000 John Gerber http://blog.securitymonks.com/?p=1626 In a stunning possible security breach, Gregory Mone reveals in his book, “The Truth About Santa: Wormholes, Robots, and What Really Happens on Christmas Eve” some of the sensitive data loss that has been occurring in Father Christmas‘ organization. Answers to questions that have plagued human kind since the first report of the jolly old elf are beginning to appear on the Internet. Through heavy research and interviews with scientists and other field experts (management consultants, Berkeley astrophysicists, Navy SEALs) Mone was able to discover that Baba Noel accomplishes the seemingly impossible annual mission using advanced science and technology. Mone claims no information was obtained through disgruntled elves.

On a mission to reveal the truth behind Pere Noel, Mone took time for an interview on NPR’s Morning Edition and did an one hour lecture at MIT. Shaula Clark reporting for the Boston Phoenix on the MIT lecture, exposed some of Babbo Natale’s trade secrets:

  • Kanakaloka is not immortal, but retains his jolly vigor with the help of organ printers.
  • Swiety Mikolaj does not, in fact, leave toys under the tree; instead, he comes bearing complex chemical reactions — toys assemble themselves in their packaging.
  • Ded Moroz’s Christmas Eve rounds are actually accomplished via several teams of Santa-recruited lieutenants, a series of short-distance wormholes, and time travel.
  • Papai Noel’s base of operations (actually in Greenland, not the North Pole) is greatly threatened by global warming — to keep his unfathomably large server farm cool, he needs the Arctic chill. Papai Noel’s own green initiatives include planting trees and cloning his elves (“because he wouldn’t want [them] breeding on their own”).

According to Mone, Sinter Klaas uses tools that are hundreds of years beyond what we have at our disposal. For example, “Santa’s suit is laden with what are called metamaterials, which have the effect of bending light around a person so that they turn invisible” — which can come in handy if there are curious children peeking during his Christmas deliveries.

Questions on the Internet have been raised as to where Mone may have obtained his information. At the beginning of the month, Mone traveled to Google allegedly to take part in the Authors@Google series. During the talk Mone discussed how implanted listening devices in the ornaments help Hoteiosho keep the naughty and nice kids straight. Also discussed was the use of cloning and wormhole technology to help Baba Chaghaloo get to every household. A few posts on the Internet question whether Google could be providing information to Shengdan Laoren through advance data mining in exchange for some of the advance technologies.

Could the US government also be involved? Those Internet posts point to the partnership between Google and NORAD (the North American Aerospace Defense Command), a bi-national United States and Canadian organization. NORAD and Google are helping children track the journey of Jolasveinar around the world using Google Maps and Google Earth. In a possible attempt to gain patents and disrupt Google market shares, there are even rumors that Gaghant Baba’s workshop has been purchased by Bill Gates. Could a secret message exist behind the Microsoft Bing commercial about Daidi na Nollag?

Google maintains that they take user privacy very seriously. In this case, I believe them. If there is trickery, Tomten would likely be behind it. How can one trust a person who goes by so many names? And what exactly is his past? Every country provides a different story. If he is a jolly old elf, there are reports that elves have used trickery as a means to an end. Local and federal governments across the world have gift policies limiting the the value and number of gifts that can be given to government employees. Gifts can be used as bribes. One could begin to wonder if the gift bearing holiday might be a cover for a massive yearly bribery event. More troubling, attempts to trace those questioning Internet posts lead back to ISPs in Greenland. Maybe Jack Bauer is needed to get at the truth.

I am not saying Chimney John is not a jolly nice fellow. I am just not a great believer in security through obscurity. There is a great deal we don’t know about Samichlaus. As security minded people, we need to be always questioning. Video of Mone’s Google talk has been made available. View it below and judge for yourself:

Wishing you a great holiday, wherever you may be and whatever you may believe.

]]>
http://blog.securitymonks.com/2009/12/21/santas-secrets-leaked/feed/ 0
Presentations http://blog.securitymonks.com/2007/10/07/presentations/ http://blog.securitymonks.com/2007/10/07/presentations/#comments Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:58:51 +0000 John Gerber http://blog.securitymonks.com/?p=54 Setting an example is not the main means of influencing another, it is the only means.” — Albert Einstein

Communications

Initial Thoughts

Scott Adams made this observation: If you were talking to Albert Einstein, and he got struck by lightning and became twice as smart, would you be able to tell? Many folks do not understand detailed technological talk. Like the manager, Jen, who in “The IT Crowd” tries but can only hear static when Moss talks computer jargon. As IT professionals, we have to learn to communicate effectively. If we do not, many folks simply cannot tell the difference between the IT professional who may be right but cannot communicate his thoughts and the guy who is just making stuff up but saying it in a smart confident manner.

I am going to be preparing security presentations for work. Basically a lunch and learn education series on security. Once I present, I will post the talks to this site. As part of the preparation, I have begun to make notes of various presentations posted in the RSS feeds I read. Slides and videos done by experts in the field are a great source of information not only on the subject matter but also on ways to present the information.

Not all the presentations available at each of the conferences are included. Please visit the conference sites and look at all the presentations. This posting is to provide a starting point and provide an idea of what is available.

Conferences

Conference sites provide a great source for ideas and material that might be of interest. Since these topics were presented this year, they are topics of concern to folks in the IT world. There are many presentations available at the conference sites. Please visit the sites for additional presentations.

CERIAS

OCEG

NIST

OWASP

Black Hat

Defcon

HITB 2007

Microsoft Bluehat

Web2Summit

Bro Intrusion Detection System Hands-On Workshop

ZDnet

Special Interest Topics

These are topics that are of special interest to me. The topics may or may not have been presented at the conferences. The presentations have been pulled from bloggers who I respect.

Blogging

Security Metrics

Fuzzing

Identity Management

Logging, E-Records, and E-evidence

Social engineering

Forensics

Bluetooth Eavesdropping

IDS abnormal detection

Phishing

Virus

Visualization

Web Application

Videos

There are videos presentations available online.

Hacking Simulations and Challenges

These sites provide nice demonstrations on hacking techniques. Plus, the sites are just plain fun.

Final Thoughts

This posting is meant as a starting point. There are some very good presentations listed above. I have been working in security for awhile. Recently I was reminded not to take anything for granted. Many very smart people can be so focused on their slice of business that they do not get much exposure to basic security. While organizations may require security refresher classes, often people just page through the online material, not paying much attention. It is my hope that by allowing organizations to select security topics to present on, that this approach can help introduce people to topics of special interest to that organization. People will be more interested in the security topics and more open to learning. Our final goal is to raise security awareness while educating folks so they can speak with confidence while actually knowing what they are talking about.

]]>
http://blog.securitymonks.com/2007/10/07/presentations/feed/ 1